dip
Obtenir dip
Module 15 · Discipline, règles et valeurs

The 'but daddy lets me' conversation

By Pauline Sam, MD ·

4–78–125 min de lecture

Version anglaise · traduction en cours

Cet article est encore en anglais. La traduction en française est en cours.

The 'but daddy lets me' conversation

You've just said no to a second hour of screen time, or yes-but-not-until-homework's-done, or no-you-can't-have-that-for-dinner. And your eight-year-old delivers the line that every co-parent hears eventually, with the timing of a small lawyer. But daddy lets me. Or mummy. The specific parent changes. The move is always the same.

It's a small moment and it can throw you more than it should, because it does two things at once. It challenges your rule, and it invokes the other home as evidence that you're being unreasonable. The instinct is to either cave, to avoid being the strict one, or to fire back something about how things are done properly here. Both reactions hand the moment more power than it warrants.

The principle. But daddy lets me is almost always a child testing a boundary, not a child reporting a policy difference. The response that works treats it as the boundary test it is, holds your own home's rule without drama, and pointedly declines the invitation to compete with the other home.

What the child is actually doing

Most of the time, this isn't really about the other home at all. It's a child doing what children do, looking for the give in a boundary. They've found a lever that sometimes works, the invocation of the Co-Parent, and they're pulling it to see if the rule moves.

Children are good at this. They learn early that the two homes have different rules, and the smart ones figure out that pointing at the more permissive home is a way to apply pressure. This isn't manipulation in any sinister sense. It's a child being a child, probing for the soft spot in the structure. The eight-year-old who says but daddy lets me is doing the developmental equivalent of leaning on a fence to see if it holds.

What they need is for the fence to hold. A boundary that moves when the other home is invoked teaches the child that your rules are negotiable through comparison, and that's an unstable structure to live in. A boundary that holds, calmly, teaches them that this home works this way regardless, which is exactly the steadiness they're unconsciously checking for.

The response that works

The move is simple and it takes practice to do without heat. You hold the rule and you locate it in this home, without commenting on the other.

Maybe he does. Here, we do it this way. That's the core of it. You haven't challenged the claim, which would drag you into litigating the other home's rules. You haven't undermined the Co-Parent, which would teach the child the homes are in conflict. You've simply, calmly, restated that your home has its own way and the way holds.

A few variations for the same move. That might be how it works at mum's. At my house, screen time stops at seven. Or, Different houses, different rules. This is the rule here. The tone matters more than the words. Bored, matter-of-fact, slightly warm, completely unbothered. The child is testing whether the rule is solid. Your calm is the answer. Drama, defensiveness, or a lecture about the other home all signal that the lever worked, that you got rattled, which invites more pulling.

What you're avoiding is the two failure modes. Caving, oh, fine, if daddy lets you, which teaches the child the lever works. And escalating, well daddy's wrong and here we have standards, which teaches the child the homes are enemies and they're holding the front line.

Don't take the bait to undermine

The invocation of the other home is, among other things, a small invitation to say something critical about the Co-Parent. But daddy lets me practically dangles it. Well, daddy lets you do a lot of things, doesn't he.

Don't take it. However satisfying the little dig might feel, it's paid for by the child. Every time you respond to but daddy lets me by criticising daddy, you teach the child that mentioning the other home causes a problem here, and that the two people they love are in opposition. Over time, the child stops mentioning the other home at all, which means you lose your window into their life there, and they learn to manage two homes that can't hear about each other.

Holding your tongue here is a discipline, and it's one of the quietly important ones. The child mentions the other home, you decline to take the shot, you hold your rule, you move on. That's the whole thing. The non-reaction is the parenting.

When the report is actually true and it matters

Sometimes but daddy lets me is accurate and points at a real gap worth addressing. Not most of the time, but sometimes. If the thing the other home permits is genuinely a concern, an actually unsafe level of something, a rule that matters to the child's wellbeing, then the issue isn't the child's boundary test, it's a real difference between the homes.

But notice the move here. You don't resolve that gap in the moment, with the child, by adjudicating the other home's rules to their face. You hold your own rule now, here, we do it this way, and you take the actual concern to the Co-Parent directly, through the adult channel, later. The earlier article on disagreeing about discipline approach covers that conversation. The child's testing moment and the adults' genuine policy gap are two separate things, handled in two separate places. Mixing them, by litigating the Co-Parent's rules through the child, is how a small moment becomes a big problem.

And mostly, it won't be a real gap. Mostly it'll be a child who'd love an extra hour of screen time and has found a lever worth trying. Hold the fence. The fence holding is the gift.

The line you carry

But daddy lets me is a boundary test wearing the costume of a policy complaint. The child is checking whether your rule is solid, and your calm holding of it is the reassurance they're actually after. Hold the rule, locate it in your home, decline to challenge or undermine the other home, and don't take the bait for a dig. Where there's a genuine concern behind the report, hold your rule now and raise the real issue with the Co-Parent later, away from the child.

The fence holding, without drama, is what your child is really asking for, even as they lean on it.

When they say "but daddy lets me," they're checking whether your fence holds. Let it hold, calmly, and that's the answer they needed.